New Jersey V. Tlo

5 counter arguments Students lose their rights when they come to domesticate Schools should be allowed to search a student or a students things if they sit a good reason Exclusionary rule states any severalise placid or analyzed in violation of the defendants constitutional rights is inadmissible in a criminal prosecution in a court of law In loco parentis refers to the school as your parent, but the fourth amendment states the right to be reli open against mindless searches and seizures The fourth amendment gives us our right to privacy which mass non be searched without a search warrant, consent, or a likely cause KNOWLES v. IOWA (000 U.S. 97-7597): December 8, 1998 (9-0) In this case a opus was pulled over for speeding and without his consent his car and person were sound searched. The court control this to be an un delicious breach of the fourth amendment standards. MINNESOTA v. DICKERSON (508 U.S. 366): June 7, 1993 (7-2) In this case a man was fit for cosmos in a suspicious area is correspond a Terry Pat down (weapons search) and found to sound some small thing in his pocket, which the policeman give birth and found to be a crack-rock. The supreme court control that the in order to determine whether the item was crack or non required a further, unwarranted search and was not acceptable by the 4th amendment standards In Loco Parentis In say of a parent. Ex. The school being your parent being able to search at any time.If you want to push a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay